Summit Delegate Disagrees With Benefit
Recommendations

Thursday, 17 September, 2009

A Child Poverty Summit convened by the Every Child Counts organisation has recommended higher core benefit levels.

As one of the 70 invited delegates attending the Summit welfare commentator Lindsay Mitchell says she did not agree with this proposal. "As a participant in the Social Exclusion workshop which made this particular recommendation, I argued against it. There are at least nine international research papers that show that an increase in benefit levels increases the number of children born outside of marriage or a stable relationship. This has the effect of drawing more children onto benefits, putting even more children at risk of the unintended consequences the Summit wants to reduce."

"Additionally, the figures supplied by Every Child Counts show that of the children living below the poverty threshold 65,000 were in sole parent families. I emphasised that there are currently around 165,000 children reliant on a DPB income. If the majority are not below the poverty threshold, why increase the level of the benefit across the board? Factors beyond the income level are responsible for the poverty."

Neither of these objections was dealt with indicating that the recommendation is more about ideology than enduring solutions.
Website created by Leighshaw Consultants Limited
Lindsay Mitchell looks at Social Welfare Reform
in New Zealand and overseas.
CONTACT:
Lindsay Mitchell

ph/fx 04 562 7944

mob 021 132 5968

Other Information:

Whanau Ora

Reforms By Country

International Welfare Statistics

Social Security programs throughout the world

Welfare Reform
in NZ Politics


Friends of Welfare Reform

Recommended Books

More about:

Maori & Welfare

Welfare & Crime

Need help to search
Parliamentary Questions?

Archives

Media Releases & Articles 03-06